Unfortunately, after what governments, health authorities, medical institutions, scientific journals and corporate media did around the World during the so-called pandemic of Covid-19, we can no longer trust any of these groups, either.
For example, I fail to see how one can trust any doctor or scientist who subscribes to mRNA technology. Doing so is like trusting an engineer who says that F=ma does not matter and have no consequence.
Thanks for your comment. Many others and I agree with you about the loss of trust between the public and a profit-driven medical industry. I also think many of us recognize that parts of the medical establishment have become heavily influenced by pharmaceutical sales. In my experience, I have found that concern completely justified.
However, I still believe there is value in presenting information about potential misinformation, even if the purpose is simply to encourage discussion and further investigation.
Certain parts of the medical establishment have a history of more than 100 years of promoting questionable or ineffective treatments. That is why I believe we need to do our best to present and discuss the facts as objectively as possible.
Published research suggests that fenbendazole may have potential as a cancer treatment, including research involving human cases and laboratory studies. Documented cases and scientific papers have reported promising results.
The research is developing, which is why continued discussion, careful examination of the evidence, and a willingness to follow where the facts lead matter.
And in the interim waiting for these studies, which they’re certainly are in no rush to do, hundreds of thousands of cancer victims die. The results from the few studies out there always end up, “we need more studies”. Sure they do! They need that grant money to continue coming in or they’re out of a job! I don’t disagree with your outlook on misinformation, but as said, a person gets a terminal diagnosis and testimonies by the thousands that ivermectin and fenben are eradicating these terminal cancers, while side effects from the ravages of chemo take more people out than the cancer itself,……
I personally know many that this has happened to. Add the turbo cancers from the jab.
I've been taking fenbendazole, mebendazole, and ivermectin over the past three years. This is a picture of my meds on my desk, a few inches from my mouse. In 2022, I had to nurse my octogenarian mother through hospice as she was overtaken by turbo cancer after the "booster shot". https://www.curriefuneralhome.net/obituaries/Molly-Mullan-Wroth?obId=24286725 Several of her friends had the same turbo-aggressive cancer deaths within months of her.
I believe in fenbendazole and ivermectin. I carefully take the drugs and supplements with a strict protocol. However, I would be misguided to sell hope without presenting both sides of the story. We certainly need more studies, more papers, more discussion, and pressure from the public. Thank you for reading, and thanks for joining the discussion in the comments. Do you believe what Mel Gibson said on The Joe Rogan Experience in January 2025? That conversation has been widely labeled "misinformation" by the media and medical establishment.
I agree that we need to not give up on first, making sure that medicine, the regulatory agencies, and medical journals clean up their act and stop being stooges for Big Pharma; and second, work on making it more affordable for reasonable to do legitimate research on "alternative" cures. If we cannot accomplish these two things (and probably more) we will never regain the trust of the public, and we will continue to have nothing but greed ruling over the medical community.
That is why only doctors and scientists with real integrity can only be trusted and followed like those from the World Council for Health or from the Independent Medical Alliance. There are also people such as yourself, Justus R. Hope, Paul Marik, Adam Gaertner, William Makis, DoorlessCarb, Angus Dalgleish, Repurposed Oncology and so on that we rely upon for terrific analyses and information. So, there should be adequate homework that needs to be done to achieve some understanding before starting on alternative treatment for cancer. Of course, there is also one's personal circumstances to take into account as well.
I find that I'm receiving new information about cancer every fortnightly and frankly, I can't keep up. It simply blows my mind.
And then, there is Pierre Kory with his minerals theory and life itself !
Somehow, I feel that we're going through the ultimate test of everything all at once, sorting out the men from the boys on every topic.
Thank you for your follow-up comment. Yes, indeed, it does seem like many different ideas and attempts to find cures are occuring rapidly these days. I hope that more existing drugs will be repurposed.
Unfortunately, after what governments, health authorities, medical institutions, scientific journals and corporate media did around the World during the so-called pandemic of Covid-19, we can no longer trust any of these groups, either.
For example, I fail to see how one can trust any doctor or scientist who subscribes to mRNA technology. Doing so is like trusting an engineer who says that F=ma does not matter and have no consequence.
Thanks for your comment. Many others and I agree with you about the loss of trust between the public and a profit-driven medical industry. I also think many of us recognize that parts of the medical establishment have become heavily influenced by pharmaceutical sales. In my experience, I have found that concern completely justified.
However, I still believe there is value in presenting information about potential misinformation, even if the purpose is simply to encourage discussion and further investigation.
Certain parts of the medical establishment have a history of more than 100 years of promoting questionable or ineffective treatments. That is why I believe we need to do our best to present and discuss the facts as objectively as possible.
Published research suggests that fenbendazole may have potential as a cancer treatment, including research involving human cases and laboratory studies. Documented cases and scientific papers have reported promising results.
The research is developing, which is why continued discussion, careful examination of the evidence, and a willingness to follow where the facts lead matter.
Thanks again for commenting.
And in the interim waiting for these studies, which they’re certainly are in no rush to do, hundreds of thousands of cancer victims die. The results from the few studies out there always end up, “we need more studies”. Sure they do! They need that grant money to continue coming in or they’re out of a job! I don’t disagree with your outlook on misinformation, but as said, a person gets a terminal diagnosis and testimonies by the thousands that ivermectin and fenben are eradicating these terminal cancers, while side effects from the ravages of chemo take more people out than the cancer itself,……
I personally know many that this has happened to. Add the turbo cancers from the jab.
https://i.postimg.cc/Cxby0KJK/20260901-094728.jpg
I've been taking fenbendazole, mebendazole, and ivermectin over the past three years. This is a picture of my meds on my desk, a few inches from my mouse. In 2022, I had to nurse my octogenarian mother through hospice as she was overtaken by turbo cancer after the "booster shot". https://www.curriefuneralhome.net/obituaries/Molly-Mullan-Wroth?obId=24286725 Several of her friends had the same turbo-aggressive cancer deaths within months of her.
I believe in fenbendazole and ivermectin. I carefully take the drugs and supplements with a strict protocol. However, I would be misguided to sell hope without presenting both sides of the story. We certainly need more studies, more papers, more discussion, and pressure from the public. Thank you for reading, and thanks for joining the discussion in the comments. Do you believe what Mel Gibson said on The Joe Rogan Experience in January 2025? That conversation has been widely labeled "misinformation" by the media and medical establishment.
I agree that we need to not give up on first, making sure that medicine, the regulatory agencies, and medical journals clean up their act and stop being stooges for Big Pharma; and second, work on making it more affordable for reasonable to do legitimate research on "alternative" cures. If we cannot accomplish these two things (and probably more) we will never regain the trust of the public, and we will continue to have nothing but greed ruling over the medical community.
That is why only doctors and scientists with real integrity can only be trusted and followed like those from the World Council for Health or from the Independent Medical Alliance. There are also people such as yourself, Justus R. Hope, Paul Marik, Adam Gaertner, William Makis, DoorlessCarb, Angus Dalgleish, Repurposed Oncology and so on that we rely upon for terrific analyses and information. So, there should be adequate homework that needs to be done to achieve some understanding before starting on alternative treatment for cancer. Of course, there is also one's personal circumstances to take into account as well.
I find that I'm receiving new information about cancer every fortnightly and frankly, I can't keep up. It simply blows my mind.
And then, there is Pierre Kory with his minerals theory and life itself !
Somehow, I feel that we're going through the ultimate test of everything all at once, sorting out the men from the boys on every topic.
Thank you for your follow-up comment. Yes, indeed, it does seem like many different ideas and attempts to find cures are occuring rapidly these days. I hope that more existing drugs will be repurposed.
Frontiersin for an oncologist journal says it all