Here is a timeline of mebendazole's human clinical history and active trials, mapped by target indication, drug combination, and trial milestones. (low expectation)
Also the case study where the liver enzymes went up to 5x the normal range suggests tumor lysis, massive die off and a struggle to clear it all, rather than actual liver damage from only 200mg of meben a day. That's a very low dose.
I believe these facts, or lack thereof, demonstrate that Big Pharma and the established medical community have ignored 16 years of evidence, most of which shows mebendazole to be useful for treating cancer in humans. I can’t find a wave of funding or new studies indicating much progress in this direction. There are a few.
Mebendazole and Fenbendazole are inexpensive Rx products that work as proven tools in fighting cancer. No giant medical organizations or pharmaceutical companies (Big Pharma) seem to be advancing that use. In fact, they ignore anecdotal evidence and often seem to discourage its use.
Your question and reaction to reading this information are right on target. You are not supposed to walk away feeling good about medical advancement. You should be pissed that only a handful of studies exist.
Your comment, “Many people lives are saved using this, but it's completely opposite in article” is right on target. While cancer kills millions, the lack of profit in these off-patent drugs blocks the entire industry from pursuing their use.
My goal is to open the reader’s eyes and show that, alongside conventional medical treatment, an inexpensive drug that may fight most cancers is widely available. Profits do not drive me. Sometimes a product comparison or historical disclosure that leaves you angry or questioning the medical industry accomplishes my goal.
Learn the facts, as presented, in medical and academic papers, then -under the supervision of a doctor- if possible, try it for yourself. Don’t give up because someone in a white coat says, “There’s nothing more we can do; I can’t help you.” My objective is to inform and help you get better. Sick people must be grounded in the truth and not overwhelmed by hype.
I believe this piece correctly reflects all active trials and clinical history.
Are you shocked after reading this article?
So am I.
Disclosure: I am not a doctor and this is not medical advice. I present facts from published medical papers with source information.
I believe these facts, or lack thereof, demonstrate that Big Pharma and the established medical community have ignored 16 years of positive evidence, most of which shows mebendazole to be useful for treating cancer in humans. I can’t find a wave of funding or new studies indicating much progress in this direction. There are a few.
Here's an inexpensive Rx product that works as a proven tool in fighting cancer, and no giant medical organizations or pharmaceutical companies (Big Pharma) seem to be advancing that use. In fact, they ignore anecdotal evidence and often seem to discourage its use. Why?
Your question and reaction to reading this information are right on target. You are not supposed to walk away with a good feeling of medical advancement. You should be pissed that only a handful of studies exist. Your comment, “Many people lives are saved using this, but it's completely opposite in article” is right on target. While cancer kills millions, the lack of profit in these off-patent drugs blocks the entire industry from pursuing their use.
My goal is to open the reader’s eyes and show that, alongside conventional medical treatment, an inexpensive drug that may fight most cancers is widely available. Profits do not drive me. Sometimes a product comparison or historical disclosure that leaves you angry or questioning the medical industry accomplishes that goal.
Learn the facts, as presented, in medical and academic papers, then -under the supervision of a doctor- if possible, try it for yourself. Don’t give up because someone in a white coat says, “There’s nothing more we can do, I can’t help you.” My objective is to inform and help you get better. Sick people must be grounded in the truth and not overwhelmed by hype.
I believe this piece correctly reflects all active trials and clinical history.
Also the case study where the liver enzymes went up to 5x the normal range suggests tumor lysis, massive die off and a struggle to clear it all, rather than actual liver damage from only 200mg of meben a day. That's a very low dose.
Excellent question.
I believe these facts, or lack thereof, demonstrate that Big Pharma and the established medical community have ignored 16 years of evidence, most of which shows mebendazole to be useful for treating cancer in humans. I can’t find a wave of funding or new studies indicating much progress in this direction. There are a few.
Mebendazole and Fenbendazole are inexpensive Rx products that work as proven tools in fighting cancer. No giant medical organizations or pharmaceutical companies (Big Pharma) seem to be advancing that use. In fact, they ignore anecdotal evidence and often seem to discourage its use.
Your question and reaction to reading this information are right on target. You are not supposed to walk away feeling good about medical advancement. You should be pissed that only a handful of studies exist.
Your comment, “Many people lives are saved using this, but it's completely opposite in article” is right on target. While cancer kills millions, the lack of profit in these off-patent drugs blocks the entire industry from pursuing their use.
My goal is to open the reader’s eyes and show that, alongside conventional medical treatment, an inexpensive drug that may fight most cancers is widely available. Profits do not drive me. Sometimes a product comparison or historical disclosure that leaves you angry or questioning the medical industry accomplishes my goal.
Learn the facts, as presented, in medical and academic papers, then -under the supervision of a doctor- if possible, try it for yourself. Don’t give up because someone in a white coat says, “There’s nothing more we can do; I can’t help you.” My objective is to inform and help you get better. Sick people must be grounded in the truth and not overwhelmed by hype.
I believe this piece correctly reflects all active trials and clinical history.
Are you shocked after reading this article?
So am I.
Disclosure: I am not a doctor and this is not medical advice. I present facts from published medical papers with source information.
Is it normal that these trials were completed but no results published?
I’m not sure, good question. We’ll try and find an accurate answer and post it. Thanks.
What does it mean? Many people lives are saved using this.but it's completely opposite in article
Excellent question.
I believe these facts, or lack thereof, demonstrate that Big Pharma and the established medical community have ignored 16 years of positive evidence, most of which shows mebendazole to be useful for treating cancer in humans. I can’t find a wave of funding or new studies indicating much progress in this direction. There are a few.
Here's an inexpensive Rx product that works as a proven tool in fighting cancer, and no giant medical organizations or pharmaceutical companies (Big Pharma) seem to be advancing that use. In fact, they ignore anecdotal evidence and often seem to discourage its use. Why?
Your question and reaction to reading this information are right on target. You are not supposed to walk away with a good feeling of medical advancement. You should be pissed that only a handful of studies exist. Your comment, “Many people lives are saved using this, but it's completely opposite in article” is right on target. While cancer kills millions, the lack of profit in these off-patent drugs blocks the entire industry from pursuing their use.
My goal is to open the reader’s eyes and show that, alongside conventional medical treatment, an inexpensive drug that may fight most cancers is widely available. Profits do not drive me. Sometimes a product comparison or historical disclosure that leaves you angry or questioning the medical industry accomplishes that goal.
Learn the facts, as presented, in medical and academic papers, then -under the supervision of a doctor- if possible, try it for yourself. Don’t give up because someone in a white coat says, “There’s nothing more we can do, I can’t help you.” My objective is to inform and help you get better. Sick people must be grounded in the truth and not overwhelmed by hype.
I believe this piece correctly reflects all active trials and clinical history.
Are you shocked after reading this article?
So am I.